Quasar MD Plus (Review)

Quasar MD Plus Rating from Providers: 4.2 out of 5
Quasar MD Plus Rating from Patients: 3.8 out of 5

Want to see how MBC reviews are calculated? Click here.

Review Summary

Quasar MD Plus is an at-home LED red light therapy device primarily discussed in the submitted reviews for fine lines, wrinkles, skin tone, inflammation, and general skin rejuvenation.

Here’s the key insight:

The treatment technology gets better reviews than the ownership experience.

Patients who used the device consistently reported improvements around the eyes, skin tightening, fading of post-acne marks, and general skin quality. There are also unusually strong examples of longevity, including devices reportedly still functioning after nine years and more than a decade.

But that durability isn’t consistent.

Other patients reported devices suddenly stopping, and frustrating experiences trying to obtain warranty support or replacements.

So while sentiment toward red light therapy and the Quasar MD Plus is favorable, the submitted reviews make product reliability and customer support nearly as important as treatment results.

Provider Praise 

(Industry sentiment from Social Media, Facebook, Instagram & Reddit)

Provider sentiment is overwhelmingly positive on paper, but it requires context.

Providers and professional accounts most frequently highlighted the Quasar MD Plus for:

• improving the appearance of fine lines and wrinkles
• supporting overall skin rejuvenation
• addressing the eye area
• supporting skin tone
• reducing inflammation
• providing a non-invasive at-home skincare option

The strongest provider feedback in the dataset actually comes from longevity rather than efficacy claims.

One provider reported purchasing a Quasar MD Plus more than a decade ago and said the device still works.

That is a useful real-world signal because it reflects an actual ownership experience rather than a marketing claim.

However, many of the remaining provider comments come from promotional Facebook and Instagram content describing the product as “highly effective,” a “skincare miracle,” or making generalized claims about LED therapy.

Those comments contributed to the overall positive sentiment, but they were given less weight when calculating the provider rating because they do not represent detailed independent provider experiences.

Provider Complaints 

(Industry sentiment from Social Media, Facebook, Instagram & Reddit)

There were essentially no direct negative provider reviews in the submitted dataset.

That sounds impressive until the source quality is considered.

Most provider comments are descriptive rather than independent assessments of long-term clinical use. As a result, the dataset tells us considerably more about how Quasar MD Plus is marketed by professional accounts than about what providers dislike after using it.

The patient reviews provide a more useful picture of the potential weaknesses—particularly around hardware reliability and customer support.

Patient Reviews 

(Industry sentiment from Reddit, Facebook, Instagram & Forums)

Patient Reviews: 3.8 out of 5 stars

What Patients Are Saying

The strongest patient feedback came from people who had actually incorporated Quasar MD Plus into their skincare routines over time.

Patients reported:

• improvement in lines around the eyes
• fewer visible wrinkles
• tighter-feeling skin
• fading of post-acne marks
• improved skin stability
• easy incorporation into an existing skincare routine
• satisfaction with long-term use

One patient who had used the Quasar MD Pro for almost a year reported a significant improvement in lines around the eyes.

Another patient reported noticeable skin tightening and fewer wrinkles around the eyes after approximately one month.

A particularly enthusiastic long-term user said the device had made the biggest difference of any facial product they had purchased and believed consistent use helped prevent crow’s feet from becoming more noticeable.

There are also positive reports around durability. One patient said their device was still working nine years after purchase.

But the negative reviews reveal a very different ownership experience.

One patient reported poor build quality, saying part of the charging assembly came loose within days and that the power cable was already failing.

A separate Reddit user described a warranty problem: after sending the device back to the company, they reported being unable to get a response.

Importantly, customer service wasn’t universally poor. Another patient described a malfunction after several years and an initially frustrating repair process, but said a new representative eventually took over the case and sent a replacement device within days.

The pattern is therefore not simply “bad customer service.”

It’s inconsistency.

Some devices reportedly last close to a decade or longer. Others develop problems quickly. Some customers ultimately receive satisfactory warranty support, while others report being left without a resolution.

Cost Breakdown

The submitted dataset does not contain enough verified information to establish a reliable current purchase price for Quasar MD Plus.

It also does not contain enough consistent information on replacement costs, warranty expenses, or other ownership costs to calculate long-term value.

However, the reviews highlight an important consideration that goes beyond the initial purchase price:

device lifespan matters.

A red light therapy device that remains functional for nine or ten years represents a very different value proposition from one that develops charging or hardware problems shortly after purchase.

For prospective buyers, warranty terms, current customer-support policies, expected device lifespan, and replacement procedures should therefore be considered alongside the purchase price.

Final Verdict

Quasar MD Plus has a more complicated review profile than its overwhelmingly positive marketing presence initially suggests.

The actual treatment feedback is encouraging.

Several patients who used the device consistently reported improvements in fine lines, particularly around the eyes, as well as skin tightening and improvements in overall skin quality. Some long-term users remain enthusiastic years after purchasing the device.

But the hardware story is inconsistent.

Reports range from devices functioning after nine years or more to charging components failing almost immediately. Customer-service experiences are similarly divided.

That makes the Quasar MD Plus less of a question about whether patients like red light therapy and more of a question about whether the device delivers a reliable enough ownership experience to justify the investment.

Best suited for:

• patients interested in at-home LED red light therapy
• patients primarily concerned with fine lines and overall skin quality
• patients willing to use the device consistently over time
• patients who prefer gradual, non-invasive skincare
• patients who understand that LED is a maintenance tool rather than a dramatic corrective procedure

Not ideal for:

• patients expecting dramatic or immediate wrinkle correction
• patients unwilling to use an at-home device consistently
• patients expecting results comparable to more aggressive in-office procedures
• buyers who prioritize exceptionally predictable hardware durability and support

Overall assessment: Quasar MD Plus earns favorable marks for the results reported by consistent users, especially around the eye area. But the device’s 3.8 patient rating reflects something efficacy claims alone don’t capture: owning the product is part of the experience. When a skincare device is designed for repeated long-term use, reliability and responsive warranty support matter almost as much as what the light does to the skin.