MonaLisa Touch Rating from Providers: 4.3 out of 5
MonaLisa Touch Rating from Patients: 4.0 out of 5

Want to see how MBC reviews are calculated? Click here.

Review Summary

MonaLisa Touch is a fractional CO2 laser treatment designed to address vaginal dryness and other symptoms associated with changes in vaginal tissue. The treatment uses fractional laser energy to create controlled microchannels in the tissue, with the goal of stimulating collagen remodeling and improving tissue quality.

The sentiment around MonaLisa Touch is largely favorable, particularly among patients who experienced significant vaginal dryness, discomfort, or related symptoms.

But here’s the key insight:

When MonaLisa Touch works well, patients sometimes describe the improvement as life-changing. The bigger question is how predictable and durable those results are.

Patients reported meaningful improvements in dryness, comfort during intercourse, lubrication, urinary symptoms, and overall quality of life. Several described relatively easy treatments and returned for maintenance because they were happy with their results.

However, the treatment is not universally successful. A smaller but important group reported substantial pain, limited improvement, high costs, or results that faded and required additional treatments.

The overall sentiment is positive, but MonaLisa Touch appears to work best when patients understand from the beginning that multiple treatments and ongoing maintenance may be part of the commitment.

Provider Praise

(Industry sentiment from Social Media, Facebook, Reddit & Forums)

Provider sentiment toward MonaLisa Touch was strongly positive.

The most consistent praise centered on its ability to provide a non-surgical treatment option for vaginal dryness and other symptoms associated with changes in vaginal tissue.

Providers repeatedly noted that:

• fractional CO2 energy is used to create controlled microchannels in vaginal tissue
• treatment is intended to stimulate collagen and tissue remodeling
• providers report improvements in moisture, elasticity, and tissue quality
• the procedure is relatively quick
• little disruption to normal daily activities is typically expected
• treatment does not require surgery
• multiple sessions are commonly recommended rather than relying on a single treatment
• some patients report improvement after the first or second session
• providers use the treatment for vaginal dryness, discomfort, and certain urinary concerns

Several provider comments also highlighted MonaLisa Touch as a non-hormonal treatment approach, which may make the technology particularly interesting for patients exploring alternatives to hormone-based management.

Another strength is the relatively short procedure time. Multiple provider comments described treatments taking approximately 15 minutes or less, making the procedure relatively easy to incorporate into a patient’s schedule.

Provider Complaints

(Industry sentiment from Social Media, Facebook, Reddit & Forums)

Direct provider criticism was limited.

Instead, the weaker provider sentiment focused primarily on treatment expectations and the realities of completing a treatment series.

Providers acknowledged that:

• multiple sessions are typically required
• results can vary between patients
• improvement may occur gradually
• maintenance treatments may be necessary
• temporary spotting or discharge can occur following treatment
• patient selection remains important

There is also an important limitation to the provider data.

A substantial amount of the positive provider commentary appears to come from practices offering MonaLisa Touch or from educational and promotional descriptions of the procedure.

For that reason, claims involving specific success percentages or descriptions of the procedure as universally painless should be interpreted more cautiously than independent provider experiences.

The provider sentiment is clearly favorable, but the submitted dataset does not establish that every patient will respond similarly.

Patient Review

(Industry sentiment from Social Media, Reddit & Forums)

Patient Rating: 4.0 out of 5

Patient sentiment was evaluated independently from provider sentiment.

What Patients Are Saying

The strongest patient feedback centered on improvement in symptoms that had significantly affected everyday comfort and quality of life.

Positive patients reported:

• significant improvement in vaginal dryness
• less discomfort during intercourse
• reduced dependence on lubricant
• improved sexual comfort and function
• improvement in urinary symptoms
• greater everyday comfort
• relatively short procedures
• manageable recovery
• willingness to return for maintenance because the initial treatment had worked

Several patient experiences were particularly enthusiastic.

A patient described the treatment as one of the best decisions she had made after initially being skeptical about spending the money.

Other patients reported improvements in urinary leakage and vaginal atrophy symptoms.

Importantly, some of the positive comments came from patients who had undergone MonaLisa Touch years earlier and subsequently returned for maintenance. That suggests that at least some patients found the initial results meaningful enough to justify continuing treatment.

Where Patients Push Back

The negative patient experiences were fewer, but they raise legitimate concerns.

The most common complaints involved:

• treatment cost
• results that eventually faded
• maintenance expenses
• little or no improvement for some patients
• significant pain for certain patients
• burning and itching after treatment
• uncomfortable short-term recovery
• inconsistent results between different treatment cycles

One patient reported undergoing two treatments at approximately $1,000 each and said the treatment was painful, temporary, and ultimately ineffective for her.

Another patient reported that previous MonaLisa Touch treatments had worked well but that a more recent treatment produced essentially no improvement.

That makes durability one of the most important considerations.

The dataset supports the possibility of meaningful improvement, but it does not support assuming those improvements will be permanent.

What About Pain?

Patient experiences with discomfort varied considerably.

Some patients described MonaLisa Touch as quick and relatively easy, comparing the discomfort to a Pap smear or laser hair removal.

Others described significant pain, burning, itching, or urinary discomfort following treatment.

Because experiences vary this much, describing MonaLisa Touch as simply “painless” would not accurately represent the patient sentiment.

A better expectation is that many patients find the treatment manageable, but discomfort can vary substantially between individuals.

Cost Breakdown

The submitted dataset does not contain verified current equipment pricing for the MonaLisa Touch system, so no conclusion can be made regarding the acquisition cost of the device.

The patient data does provide some insight into treatment costs.

One patient reported paying approximately $1,000 per treatment, while several others specifically mentioned that maintenance could become expensive.

Provider commentary commonly described an initial treatment protocol involving approximately three sessions spaced around six weeks apart, although individual treatment recommendations may vary.

That means practices evaluating MonaLisa Touch should consider more than the revenue from an individual session.

Important business considerations include:

• device acquisition cost
• maintenance and service expenses
• average treatment price
• number of treatments in the initial series
• frequency of maintenance treatments
• patient retention
• repeat-treatment acceptance
• patient satisfaction relative to treatment cost

The submitted sentiment does not contain enough verified financial information to calculate practice-level ROI.

Final Verdict

MonaLisa Touch receives strong provider sentiment and a clearly favorable patient response overall.

The strongest patient experiences are compelling.

Women reported meaningful improvements in dryness, sexual comfort, lubrication, urinary symptoms, and everyday quality of life. Some were satisfied enough to continue returning for maintenance treatments years later.

But the negative experiences matter.

A smaller group reported spending significant amounts of money only to experience pain, temporary improvement, or no meaningful results at all.

That makes MonaLisa Touch less of a guaranteed solution and more of a treatment where patient selection, expectations, and willingness to maintain results matter considerably.

Best suited for:

• practices treating vaginal dryness and related symptoms
• patients seeking a non-surgical treatment option
• patients comfortable completing a treatment series
• women who understand that maintenance may be necessary
• practices prepared to have realistic conversations about variable outcomes
• patients willing to balance treatment cost against potential quality-of-life improvement

Not ideal for:

• patients expecting permanent results from one treatment series
• patients expecting guaranteed symptom resolution
• patients unwilling to consider maintenance treatments
• practices positioning the treatment as universally painless
• patients for whom recurring treatment costs may be difficult to justify
• providers unwilling to discuss the possibility of limited or temporary results

Overall assessment: MonaLisa Touch earns a 4.0 out of 5 patient rating because the majority of patient sentiment is positive, with several patients describing substantial improvements in symptoms and quality of life. Provider sentiment is even stronger. The caveat is consistency: pain, cost, longevity, and treatment response vary enough that MonaLisa Touch should not be positioned as a guaranteed or permanent solution. For patients who respond well, the improvement can be significant. For those who do not, the financial and treatment commitment can be difficult to justify.